Gove unveils new ‘Conservation Covenants’ to protect nature
The first of the UK’s new Conservation Covenants to unleash a new wave of legal safeguards for England’s wildlife and natural environment have been revealed today.
The covenants are subject to a consultation launched by Environment Secretary Michael Gove seeking views on how best to introduce them, fulfilling a commitment made in the 25-Year Environment Plan.
The covenants, which are already used successfully in other countries, would allow landowners to make a public commitment to take positive actions to preserve and improve treasured features on their land – such as trees, woodland or flower-rich meadow.
They would be binding on future owners of the land and would be overseen by responsible bodies to ensure land management obligations are delivered.
Environment Secretary, Michael Gove said: “Conservation covenants are a valuable new tool to help protect our precious countryside. They allow landowners to safeguard nature on their land, securing long-term benefits and enabling vital investment in future conservation.
These plans are a further step in our ambition to be the first generation to leave the environment in a better state than we found it.
“I urge people to have their say on the proposals, which we are considering for our forthcoming Environment Bill.”
Natural England interim chief executive Marian Spain said: “Natural England has long believed that conservation covenants could be useful for landowners and secure long term environment gains for nature.
“It is pleasing to hear that a number of landowners and farmers are already interested and want to hear more about the Government’s proposals.”
Legal covenants already exist to prevent certain types of actions, but by encouraging positive environmental actions, a conservation covenant may achieve a lasting legacy for land management for generations to come.
The main scenarios likely to involve the use of conservation covenants:
- Altruistic uses;
- Securing heritage sites;
- An alternative to land purchase by conservation organisations;
- Disposals of land by conservation organisations;
- Payment for ecosystem services;
- Net gain for biodiversity.
They might also be used in a business context to secure the long-term maintenance of existing or newly created wildlife or heritage assets.
Prof. Nicholas Hopkins, commissioner for property, family and trust law at the Law Commission said: “We are delighted that the government is consulting on implementing our conservation covenants Report.
“These recommendations would make it simpler and easier for landowners to make agreements that will protect the environment, archaeological sites and historically important buildings for generations to come.”
The consultation will seek a range of views from the public and especially from key interested organisations and individuals including landowners, conservation groups and others.
CLA president Tim Breitmeyer said: “Conservation covenants have the potential to help deliver a range of environmental and other public benefits across the countryside.
In the right circumstances, they can be an important tool for those landowners who are considering making a long-term investment in the environment.
“We are pleased that the Government is consulting on how best to introduce these measures and look forward to engaging to ensure they work for those landowners who wish to take part as well as the environment.”
Matthew Darby, landowner, farmer and trustee of the Kemerton Conservation Trust said: “I’ve always wanted to protect some of the special parts of my farm forever – places with a bit of magic that deserve to be enjoyed by future generations.
“Conservation covenants could provide part of the answer. I see them acting as a bridge between landowners and those paying for public goods.
I could invest this sum back into the farming business so that my family could continue to live on the land and care for it.
“These covenants could provide multiple wins – for families, for public goods, and for natural places.”
What can Conservation Covenants include?
Defra has offered some practical examples of what the cobe included in Conservation Covenants:
A landowner who has inherited extensive moorland which includes a crag much used by rock climbers. The landowner intends to leave the land to his children.
They use a conservation covenant to ensure that the moorland is properly managed and that the public continues to have access to the crag.
Securing heritage sites
A farmer, who is also a keen amateur archaeologist has the buried remains of a Romano-British villa on her land. She is keen to ensure its protection and agrees to take the land out of cultivation.
She would like the appropriate management to be maintained after she has disposed of the land and uses a conservation covenant to secure this outcome.
An alternative to land purchase by conservation organisations
A wildlife charity identifies a plot of land as containing the habitat of a native bird species.
It makes a financial offer to the landowner in return for the land being maintained as a habitat. The landowner agrees.
The conservation covenant sets out the obligations that the landowner has to undertake to receive the financial offer.
Disposals of land by conservation organisations
A heritage group has invested funds in buying and restoring a Victorian house.
The organisation wishes to sell the land but ensure that the work it has undertaken, and the heritage value of the property, are preserved.
A conservation covenant ensures that future owners of the property maintain the conservation improvements made through the restoration work.
Payment for ecosystem services
An area of woodland upstream of a river which passes near homes has helped to mitigate localised flooding.
After negotiations, the landowner agrees to continue with current land management practices, restoring and maintaining the woodland in return for a yearly payment.
The obligations for land management and annual payments are set out in a covenant between the landowner and the responsible body.
Net gain for biodiversity
A local planning authority receives a planning application for a new housing development on land with some nature conservation value.
The proposed development has retained habitat where possible and undertaken nature enhancement within the design but cannot entirely mitigate its impacts on site.
In accordance with the recently updated National Planning Policy Framework, the local authority asks the developer to agree to improve habitats elsewhere in the local area to ensure the development leads to a net positive impact on wildlife habitats before granting permission.
A conservation covenant provides one possible mechanism for securing permanent land-management obligations for the area of improved habitat.