Letter to the editor: Rejection of Agriculture Bill feels ‘out of step with both industry and public sentiment’
While it is understandable that the government would not want to jeopardise future trade deals at this critical juncture, the Commons’ rejection of the proposed amendments to the Agriculture Bill does feel out of step with both industry and public sentiment.
There has been a sharper focus on provenance in recent years, both in relation to food standards and sustainability.
Following last week’s vote, British consumers will likely demand greater accountability and insight from producers and grocers from January onwards.
All of us would benefit from greater collaboration and data transparency across the food network. The technology exists, all that has been missing is the impetus.
Ultimately, it will be increased consumer scrutiny that will drive this change, with visibility from seed to fork.
From Graeme McCracken, managing director, Proagrica, Surrey
Agriculture Bill rejection
The Agriculture Bill was defeated in a vote in Westminster by MP’s on October 12.
Farming organisations across the country reacted with dismay at the news as the Bill would have safeguarded animal welfare laws for food imports.
National Farmers’ Union (NFU) president Minette Batters said:
“Once again the Commons has debated the Agriculture Bill without any binding commitments on how to safeguard our farmers’ high standards of animal welfare and environmental protection in our trade policy.
The future of British food and farming is at stake. Without proper safeguards on future trade deals we risk seeing an increase in food imports that have been produced to standards that would be illegal here.
“I hope the Agriculture Bill returning to the House of Lords gives a new opportunity for the Lords to put forward an amendment that will give the Commission more teeth and enable MPs to have their say.”